Metadata and Database Designs

Just when I thought I had a handle on data, I was introduced to metadata. To say it was complex was an understatement. Essentially data upon data, metadata ranges from a sample of information to broad, complex topics. It encompasses a variety of information and details, regarding who, what, when, and how data was developed. Personally, I thought it was interesting to see just how discussion revolves around terms in metadata. For instance, the point about different terms being used for ‘creator’, and ‘author’ was very interesting to think about. It definitely makes it clear why the topic is so detailed.

 

It was also interesting to see how database designs are constructed. There is a lot of detail that goes into database development, and even the simpler forms require some effort. Since the creation of a database involves multiple factors, such as security, it means that a lot of tasks in its production result in various individuals or teams contributing to it. It also takes a lot of time to sort through different statistics and facts and analyze them, before placing them into a data model. In addition, there are continuous debates around certain metrics and labels, just as metadata content can be controversial. It was a very informative experience for me to see how these factors influence databases.

Comments

  1. NataliaSeptember 18, 2022 at 3:48 PM

    Hello, I agree with your opening statement on data. I also thought I had a good understanding before learning about metadata. Metadata is very complex, and has various forms. I never thought about how important it is to differentiate between "creator" and "author".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maps & Virtual Spaces

  I thought it was interesting to learn about the range of complexity that is mapping and GIS, just like digital humanities. It seems that the more qualities of the digital humanities that we learn, the more it helps to break down what the digital humanities are. That being said it is odd that adding complex features of the subject would make it easier to understand. For mapping, it seems to be complex in the way that there are so many ways to layer the information that is to be given. I like that the chapter on the subject in our textbook broke down the different purposes of using maps to relay information.  The text also discusses a virtual exhibit created to recreate Pompeii. This reminded me of when I visited Pompeii, I got to see some of the 3D models that were created to represent its appearance, and I even remember there being a virtual exhibit that broke down the volcano erupting and the pattern (most likely based on evidence gathered) in which it buried the city.  On the googl
Read more

Blog post 2: Data & Digitilzation

  The section on data helps and relates to my project for analysis because now that I have a better understanding of what is is I can find more things to analyse from my site. Data (like digital humanities) is a lot broader of a subject than I initial thought it was. It's not all about the obvious numbers like you'd automatically assume, it can include things like "text, beats in a measure, pixels on a screen, and distances on a map can all be turned into quantitative data," (Drucker, 19). This very helpful as a guide for what to focus on/analyse on my website.  The checklist for creating a data model was very helpful, I like that it breaks down with instructions. Data and digitalisation play a key role in digital humanities by being the large part of what makes it up. They apply to the website I'm analysing especially the digitalisation because my site is composed of a bunch of imported files to journals and projects. These chapters gave a dive into these compone
Read more

What is digital humanities?

  Kaitlin Carroll     When I think of the d igital humanities the first thing that pops into my head is a computer. Whether thats accurate or not it's what pops into my brain. Digital obviously makes me think about electronics, and then following it with humanities make me think of how people interact/express themselves within those electronics. After playing around with the blog and reading some of the Digital Humanities course book, the definition of digital humanities can be interpreted to be combining humanities properties with computational methods. (Drucker, pg 1). The components that Johnna Drucker discussed in her book of digital humanities were most helpful at breaking that subject down for me. In the manifesto, it is explained that it is hard to limit what can be classified as digital humanities because the subject is wide with various allowances of what counts as the category. I like this because then digital humanities is a perfect way to be expressive in a persons own
Read more